By what metric? I'm asking because I'm genuinely curious. How has branding the team with the name of an energy drink actually failed, past "I don't like it and they haven't won an MLS Cup?" Is it "They've had a revolving door of coaches and made bad personnel decisions?" Because (quiet as it's kept) not only did the same franchise have that exact same MO for years under its old moniker, they're not the only club in the league for which this is true. And that's a fair enough opinion to hold, I guess. But the point of my original post was that we've moved on. That discussion was from 2006. It's not breaking new ground to bring that up. If they get out of MLS because they don't feel they're getting a return on their investment, fine, that's a business decision and one they're entitled to make. But if they don't get out of MLS, they're still going to have a team branded after an energy drink and asking if it's good or bad for the league isn't going to make them change their mind. It's pointless. We had that discussion six years ago.