Obama Failure Thread Part VI

Discussion in 'Politics & Current Events' started by argentine soccer fan, Feb 5, 2013.

  1. ToasterLeavins

    ToasterLeavins Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Location:
    NJ USA
    Club:
    Everton FC
    You are a ****** idiot.


  2. ToasterLeavins

    ToasterLeavins Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Location:
    NJ USA
    Club:
    Everton FC
    Why is it so hard for liberals to understand that when you have had a reduced tax rate for almost 10 years, to the vast majority of the population if you let that expire, for all intents and purposes you are raising taxes? If you want to get semantic, then yea, its not a tax hike. In terms of real life impact it most definitely is.
  3. superdave

    superdave Member+

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 1999
    Location:
    Raleigh
    Club:
    DC United
    Country:
    United States
    Coming from you that's a badge of honor.
    fatbastard repped this.
  4. fatbastard

    fatbastard Member+

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2003
    Location:
    Lincoln (ish), Va
    Club:
    DC United
    Country:
    United States
    Because we were smart enough to realize what was actually happening in real life instead of the fantasy world where un-needed stupid tax cuts that finally are allowed to expire are called tax hikes.
    And not in the current news world where even the recent very temporary payroll tax discount expiring is described very incorrectly as "Obama raising your taxes" on every single news channel.

    liberal media my big fat ass :rolleyes:


  5. MattR

    MattR Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Location:
    Reston
    Club:
    DC United
    Country:
    United States
    Why is so hard for conservatives to understand that sound economic policy can not include jacking up defense spending, starting various wars around the world, increasing the intelligence community tenfold, creating various new agencies, while simultaneously cutting tax rates?

    And now you're shocked, SHOCKED that there is a ballooning deficit.
    Dyvel and Boloni86 repped this.
  6. Dr. Wankler

    Dr. Wankler Member+

    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    Location:
    The Electric City
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Covered brilliantly in this book.

    [​IMG]

    It's almost like the Republicans deliberately run up massive deficits so that, down the road, there's no money to run the government.
  7. Chris M.

    Chris M. Member+

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2002
    Location:
    Chicago
    Probably for the same reasons that "conservatives" have difficulty with the concept that taxes were at their absolute lowest on the "job creators" in a couple of decades and yet the lower they went the fewer jobs. Oh, and by the way, it should be noted that the "tax increase" you speak of still leaves every single person in this country paying less in federal tax then they did at the end of the Clinton administration. Yes, even those poor top 1%ers.
    fatbastard repped this.
  8. ToasterLeavins

    ToasterLeavins Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Location:
    NJ USA
    Club:
    Everton FC
    I'm just saying i understand why people view it as a tax increase even though its not. I disagree with them, but i understand where they get it from. I suppose it would be easier if i just labeled all the people who think that stupid.
  9. puttputtfc

    puttputtfc Member+

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 1999
    Because you have a lazy definition of conservative. While your post is mostly true people who believe those things are Republicans, neo-cons or morons but not conservative.
  10. ToasterLeavins

    ToasterLeavins Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2003
    Location:
    NJ USA
    Club:
    Everton FC
    You can stop trying to use the defense spending issue as some kind of bludgeon also. I side with republicans on some issues, defense spending is most definitely not one of them.
  11. Quayle

    Quayle Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Club:
    St. Louis Lions
    Ummm, no that's not right. Taxes reduced are monies returned to those who earned them. I don't understood how politicians and/or libs figure that the money we earn and money that the gov't takes from us is their money. If the gov't usually takes $20 from me, then decides to only take $16, it's not like they are giving me free money.
    superdave repped this.
  12. luftmensch

    luftmensch Member+

    Joined:
    May 4, 2006
    Location:
    Petaluma
    Club:
    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Country:
    United States
    Money the government prints and money that the government provides the safe context within which you can earn that money.
  13. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Country:
    United States
    Barack Obama's a conservative?
  14. taosjohn

    taosjohn Member+

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    taos,nm
    Just almost like.

    Its the redwhiteandblue sparkles that make it different.
    Dr. Wankler and Kobranzilla repped this.
  15. HerthaBerwyn

    HerthaBerwyn Member+

    Joined:
    May 24, 2003
    Location:
    Chicago
    Not just for bankers this time? How unfair to bankers.
  16. Cascarino's Pizzeria

    Cascarino's Pizzeria Member+

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2001
    Location:
    New Jersey, USA
    Obama's amnesty plan for immigrants much tougher than Ronnie's:

    Draft immigration legislation being hammered out by the White House was leaked to USA Today over the weekend, and the paper had no trouble finding Republicans who balked at the president's plan. Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), one of the members of the bipartisan "Gang of Eight" who recently cooperated on a proposal for comprehensive immigration reform,called the White House draft "dead on arrival."

    Opponents of immigration reform however, see the exchange as theater—"the point of leaking the bill is to enable Rubio to say that his amnesty plan is waaay different from the dastardly Obama plan," wrote the Center for Immigration Studies' Mark Krikorian at National Review. As a policy matter, Krikorian isn't entirely wrong: Rubio's hometown paper, the Miami Herald, also got ahold of the White House's drafts and concluded that they "closely resemble many of the reforms advanced in 2011 by Obama and, more recently, by Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio." (If you've been reading Mother Jones, that's hardly surprising.)

    What may be surprising however, is that Obama's bill sets out a very long road to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. As Suzy Khimm writes at the Washington Post, under Obama's proposal, those undocumented immigrants who are eligible for legalization would likely have to wait around 13 years for full citizenship—eight years of temporary legal status before acquiring a green card, then, as is standard under US law, about another five for citizenship. (If a backlog of existing visa applications is cleared before that initial eight years, the total wait could be shorter.) Lynn Tramonte, deputy director of the pro-reform group America's Voice, tells Khimm that Obama's proposal would "delay citizenship another generation."

    Compare that with the Immigration Control and Reform Act of 1986 that was signed by President Ronald Reagan, which allowedundocumented immigrants to apply for green cards after a temporary legal status of just 18 months. Add in the standard five years green-card holders have to wait before seeking citizenship, and under the bill Reagan signed the path to citizenship was half as long as Obama's would be.

    So if you're looking for an indication of where America's immigration debate stands in 2013, note that Obama's liberal proposal would be significantly harsher than the law put in place by the patron saint of American conservatism more than 25 years ago.
  17. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Country:
    United States
    That qualifies as Obama failure.
  18. ratdog

    ratdog Member+

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2004
    Location:
    In the doghouse
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    Country:
    United States
    Isn't lying again TOS? Or are we all free to just keep repeating any old bullshit we make up despite said bullshit being decisively disproved?

    If we can just say whatever we want with no consequences, then let's discuss how NAMBLA is a wholly owned subsidiary of the GOP.
    fatbastard repped this.
  19. taosjohn

    taosjohn Member+

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    taos,nm
    I'd say it qualifies as "yellow snow."

    It offers the Republicans a chance to oppose Obama, fix a problem, and buy a slice of electoral relevance all at the same time.

    But recent experience suggests they'll offer a version that requires a 25 year wait, and thus manage only the "oppose Obama" part.

    While hanging a RINO label on Rubio to start the next primary cycle...

    Either way Obama wins.
  20. GiuseppeSignori

    GiuseppeSignori Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Country:
    United States
    Chris Hayes had a chart this weekend showing how Republican voters support a comprehensive immigration bill, but when Obama's name is attached to it, the numbers flip. Considering the Republican House caucus is the real obstacle to getting immigration reform passed, and Obama is enemy #1 for them, it may take some of Obama's three-dimensional chess playing to get this thing across the finish line.
  21. Umar

    Umar Member+

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2005
    Location:
    One step ahead
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Country:
    Palestine
    Maybe Obama could change his name by deed poll? To Herbert J Smith, or something? Or do you need a 2/3 senate majority to do that as well?
  22. Dr. Wankler

    Dr. Wankler Member+

    Joined:
    May 2, 2001
    Location:
    The Electric City
    Club:
    Chicago Fire
    The cartoonist in my local paper must've watched Hayes.

    [​IMG]
  23. superdave

    superdave Member+

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 1999
    Location:
    Raleigh
    Club:
    DC United
    Country:
    United States
    I repped this post, and unironically, too.

    I agree with Quayle's basic point that too often liberals have the mentality he describes. Obviously me and Quayle disagree on many, many (many, many, many) things. But I think he's right here.

    Taxes are a necessary evil. Quayle and I differ on the weight given to the last two words of that sentence, but he's right on the main point.
  24. superdave

    superdave Member+

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 1999
    Location:
    Raleigh
    Club:
    DC United
    Country:
    United States
    That's just awful.

    Everyone knows it's the other way around.
  25. MasterShake29

    MasterShake29 Member+

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Jersey City, NJ
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Country:
    United States
    And as usual, when Obama wins, America loses.

Share This Page